Team FOG Naestved Vs BK Amager

21 ott 2009 103 - 82 Finale
Team FOG Naestved logo

Team FOG Naestved

Giocatore Pun Reb Ast Min 2R-2T 3R-3T FG% 1R-1T 1% Ro Rd Reb Ast Pp Pr Sto Fa Pun Val
Mickey Dennis 29 6 6 28 5-7 5-7 71.4% 4-4 100.0% 2 4 6 6 0 3 0 1 29 40
Peter Johansen 25 9 2 27 9-13 0-0 69.2% 7-9 77.8% 5 4 9 2 0 0 0 2 25 30
Julian McFarlane 14 4 0 25 1-5 4-5 50.0% 0-0 - 0 4 4 0 0 2 0 2 14 15
Peter Christensen 12 0 1 15 0-1 4-6 57.1% 0-0 - 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 12 10
Alanas Dzeranovas 7 1 2 20 1-2 1-4 33.3% 2-2 100.0% 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 1 7 8
Stephen clyde Johnson 6 2 3 19 3-7 0-1 37.5% 0-0 - 1 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 6 6
Martin Hoirup 5 5 1 18 2-2 0-0 100.0% 1-2 50.0% 2 3 5 1 0 1 0 3 5 11
Danilo Fatic 2 0 1 11 1-2 0-0 50.0% 0-0 - 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 2 4
Niels Andreasen 2 2 0 10 1-2 0-1 33.3% 0-0 - 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 2
Jonas Buchholdt 1 1 0 4 0-0 0-0 - 1-2 50.0% 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1
Lars Hoirup 0 1 3 12 0-0 0-3 0.0% 0-0 - 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 1
Mikael Hansen 0 1 0 5 0-1 0-0 0.0% 0-0 - 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
Team FOG Naestved logo
Team FOG Naestved
103 32 19 200 23-42 14-27 53.6% 15-19 78.9% 14 18 32 19 0 10 0 20 103 128
BK Amager logo

BK Amager

Giocatore Pun Reb Ast Min 2R-2T 3R-3T FG% 1R-1T 1% Ro Rd Reb Ast Pp Pr Sto Fa Pun Val
Mathias Seilund 15 9 0 27 3-9 2-5 35.7% 3-4 75.0% 5 4 9 0 0 2 0 3 15 16
Sebastian Seilund 14 2 1 26 4-5 1-4 55.6% 3-4 75.0% 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 1 14 12
Emil Frost 13 4 1 22 3-5 2-5 50.0% 1-2 50.0% 2 2 4 1 0 0 0 2 13 12
Mads Rasmussen 13 0 3 23 5-8 1-1 66.7% 0-2 0.0% 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 13 11
Rasmus Larsen 9 1 1 14 2-5 1-2 42.9% 2-2 100.0% 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 9 7
Marcus Bradley 8 0 3 32 1-1 2-6 42.9% 0-0 - 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 8 7
Peter Simonsen 5 0 1 15 0-1 1-1 50.0% 2-2 100.0% 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 5 5
Nicolas Christensen 3 2 0 16 0-0 1-2 50.0% 0-0 - 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 3 4
Yaw Sandy Lundberg 2 0 0 6 1-2 0-0 50.0% 0-0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1
Mikkel Davidsen 0 1 0 3 0-0 0-0 - 0-0 - 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Steffen Larsen 0 1 0 2 0-1 0-0 0.0% 0-0 - 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
David Jatta 0 0 1 9 0-0 0-1 0.0% 0-0 - 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
BK Amager logo
BK Amager
82 20 11 200 19-37 11-27 46.9% 11-16 68.8% 11 9 20 11 0 2 0 16 82 76