2010-2011 Season
Game by game stats for Damian Eargle
Game | Date | Score | Pts | Reb | Ast | MIN | 2M-2A | 3M-3A | FG% | 1M-1A | 1% | Or | Dr | Reb | Ast | Stl | To | Blk | Pts | Eff |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nov 12, 2010 | W 64-61 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 28 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 40.0% | 0-2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 10 |
|
Nov 16, 2010 | W 64-53 | 7 | 14 | 1 | 34 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 42.9% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 17 |
|
Nov 20, 2010 | L 91-84 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | - | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
Nov 24, 2010 | W 73-67 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 20 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 55.6% | 5-7 | 71.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 15 | 21 |
|
Nov 27, 2010 | W 91-63 | 7 | 9 | 2 | 18 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% | 3-5 | 60.0% | 1 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 18 |
|
Dec 2, 2010 | L 76-67 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 21 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 62.5% | 0-0 | - | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 16 |
|
Dec 8, 2010 | L 74-59 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 30 | 6-13 | 0-0 | 46.2% | 1-5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 9 |
|
Dec 11, 2010 | L 90-60 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 20 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 100.0% | 0-0 | - | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
|
Dec 16, 2010 | L 67-50 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 20 | 3-10 | 0-1 | 27.3% | 0-3 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -1 |
|
Dec 30, 2010 | W 71-69 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 24 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0.0% | 2-2 | 100.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
|
Jan 1, 2011 | L 53-83 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 25 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 42.9% | 4-5 | 80.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 13 |
|
Jan 7, 2011 | L 79-55 | 15 | 8 | 0 | 32 | 7-14 | 0-0 | 50.0% | 1-2 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 19 |
|
Jan 9, 2011 | L 84-79 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 50.0% | 1-1 | 100.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9 |
|
Jan 15, 2011 | L 51-61 | 20 | 8 | 0 | 32 | 9-16 | 0-0 | 56.3% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 17 |
|
Jan 20, 2011 | L 62-66 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 33.3% | 0-3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
|
Jan 22, 2011 | L 69-73 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 29 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 37.5% | 0-2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 |
|
Jan 27, 2011 | L 84-71 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 30 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 44.4% | 1-2 | 50.0% | 1 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 19 |
|
Jan 29, 2011 | L 83-61 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 24 | 2-9 | 0-0 | 22.2% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
|
Feb 3, 2011 | W 62-60 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 32 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 63.6% | 2-4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 25 |
|
Feb 5, 2011 | L 78-86 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 60.0% | 2-2 | 100.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 11 |
|
Feb 7, 2011 | L 74-70 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 30 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 50.0% | 2-2 | 100.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 6 |
|
Feb 12, 2011 | L 86-76 | 22 | 5 | 1 | 30 | 10-18 | 0-0 | 55.6% | 2-5 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 17 |
|
Feb 16, 2011 | L 91-79 | 25 | 11 | 0 | 34 | 10-18 | 0-0 | 55.6% | 5-9 | 55.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 25 | 27 |
|
Feb 19, 2011 | W 83-76 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 21 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 75.0% | 3-7 | 42.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 14 |
|
Feb 24, 2011 | L 60-71 | 19 | 7 | 1 | 34 | 8-15 | 0-0 | 53.3% | 3-5 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 22 |
|
Feb 26, 2011 | L 87-94 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 28 | 7-12 | 0-0 | 58.3% | 3-5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 17 |
|
Mar 1, 2011 | L 80-71 | 21 | 9 | 1 | 33 | 9-18 | 0-0 | 50.0% | 3-5 | 60.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 24 |