Romania - Division A basketball (ROM-1)

Standings for 2012-2013 season

Rk Team % Victory Gp Gw GL Pts+ Pts- Pts+ /g Pts- /g Diff Expected
Winning %
1 CSM CSU Oradea CSM CSU Oradea 76.7 30 23 7 2446 2113 81.5 70.4 11.1 88.4
2 CSU Asesoft CSU Asesoft 76.7 30 23 7 2677 2342 89.2 78.1 11.1 86.5
3 Mures Mures 76.7 30 23 7 2481 2202 82.7 73.4 9.3 84.0
4 SCMU Craiova SCMU Craiova 70.0 30 21 9 2464 2325 82.1 77.5 4.6 69.2
5 CS Municipal Medias CS Municipal Medias 66.7 30 20 10 2446 2158 81.5 71.9 9.6 85.1
6 U-BT Cluj Napoca U-BT Cluj Napoca 66.7 30 20 10 2530 2284 84.3 76.1 8.2 80.6
7 Timisoara Timisoara 66.7 30 20 10 2522 2335 84.1 77.8 6.3 74.5
8 Municipal Bucuresti Municipal Bucuresti 60.0 30 18 12 2532 2425 84.4 80.8 3.6 64.6
9 CSM Targu Jiu CSM Targu Jiu 50.0 30 15 15 2392 2373 79.7 79.1 0.6 52.8
10 CSU Sibiu CSU Sibiu 46.7 30 14 16 2329 2292 77.6 76.4 1.2 55.5
11 FC Arges Pitesti FC Arges Pitesti 43.3 30 13 17 2370 2311 79.0 77.0 2.0 58.7
12 Giurgiu Giurgiu 36.7 30 11 19 2309 2358 77.0 78.6 -1.6 42.7
13 Timba Timisoara Timba Timisoara 26.7 30 8 22 2240 2478 74.7 82.6 -7.9 19.7
14 Farul Constanta Farul Constanta 23.3 30 7 23 2050 2443 68.3 81.4 -13.1 8.0
15 CSM Miercurea Ciuc CSM Miercurea Ciuc 10.0 30 3 27 2141 2571 71.4 85.7 -14.3 7.3
16 Dinamo Bucuresti Dinamo Bucuresti 3.3 30 1 29 1926 2845 64.2 94.8 -30.6 0.4

Standings glossary

Stats abbreviations

  • Rk: rank
  • % Victory: number of win / number of games played
  • Gp: number of games played
  • Gw: number of games won
  • GL: number of games lost
  • Pts+: total number of points scored by the team
  • Pts-: total number of points scored by opposing teams
  • Pts+ /g: total number of points scored by the team per game
  • Pts- /g: total number of points scored by opposing teams per game
  • Diff: difference between points scored and received per game
  • Expected Winning %: through our basketball statistical database and the use of advanced stats, we are able to project a team’s win percentage which then allows us to project how many wins a team is expected to have. These projections are a unique way to understand whether a team has played better or worse than their record indicates.